|
Post by Rockies GM (Joey) on Jun 16, 2016 17:34:36 GMT -6
But again its only 0-2 it could still end up 3-2 or 0-3 or 1-3 or 2-3.
|
|
|
Post by Jamie (Cleveland GM) on Jun 16, 2016 17:39:05 GMT -6
I would just rather try to start a new trade then wait for the 3rd rejection this trade was there for almost 24 hrs before a comment so i would rather start a new one and be done with it- so can i cancel this one and start a new one
|
|
|
Post by Jamie (Cleveland GM) on Jun 16, 2016 17:43:38 GMT -6
please next tab member online veto this trade otherwise it will go in to a never ending holding pattern
|
|
|
Post by Rockies GM (Joey) on Jun 16, 2016 17:46:34 GMT -6
24 Hrs is not a lot of time for a trade to begin with so not sure why that is a case for allowing you to cancel an agreed to deal that has already received votes.
Before I could even respond you went and made that post.
|
|
|
Post by Jamie (Cleveland GM) on Jun 16, 2016 17:57:50 GMT -6
guess i am impatient was hoping to get Duvall while I had injured OFs
|
|
|
Post by PadresGM on Jun 16, 2016 22:08:08 GMT -6
Alright, I'll veto. I don't think it's that bad as the difference between Stewart and Riley makes up for the difference between Duvall and the FYPD pick. However, adding the 2 relievers were unnecessary (especially Law who I would give B- value while Osich has C/C+ value). If it were just Osich, I would approve, but I feel Giants is unnecessarily giving up Law. Thus I veto
0-3
|
|