|
|
Post by Phillies GM (Keith) on Feb 21, 2020 7:46:25 GMT -6
Just go with the current yes side. We didn't even vote on the details of the main rule. It's fine.
|
|
|
|
Post by dbacksgm on Feb 21, 2020 10:31:52 GMT -6
No and no
|
|
|
|
Post by Orioles - (James) on Feb 21, 2020 14:25:16 GMT -6
Yes and yes
|
|
|
|
Post by Rockies GM (Joey) on Feb 21, 2020 15:00:54 GMT -6
Just to clear something up. Was it assumed that if you did not meet the mins (50 AB and/or 10 IP) that you would get automatic losses for those 2 categories plus the listed penalties? Yes - Braves, Brewers, Angels, A's, Mets, Orioles (6)No - Rays, Phillies, White Sox, Padres, Tigers, Reds, DBacks (6)Currently its not set-up that way but it's easy to do if assumed. If it was not assumed, should it be that way Yes - Braves, Brewers, Angels, A's, Mets, White Sox, Padres, Tigers (8)No - Rays, Phillies, Reds, DBacks (4) |
|
|
|
Post by Mariners GM (Kenny) on Feb 22, 2020 18:58:16 GMT -6
No and yes
|
|
|
|
Post by TribeCalledKey (Indians) on Feb 24, 2020 11:10:32 GMT -6
no & yes
|
|
|
|
Post by Rockies GM (Joey) on Feb 26, 2020 21:01:36 GMT -6
Just to clear something up. Was it assumed that if you did not meet the mins (50 AB and/or 10 IP) that you would get automatic losses for those 2 categories plus the listed penalties? Yes - Braves, Brewers, Angels, A's, Mets, Orioles (6)No - Rays, Phillies, White Sox, Padres, Tigers, Reds, DBacks, Indians (7)Currently its not set-up that way but it's easy to do if assumed. If it was not assumed, should it be that way Yes - Braves, Brewers, Angels, A's, Mets, White Sox, Padres, Tigers, Indians (9)No - Rays, Phillies, Reds, DBacks (4)13/28 |
|
|
|
Post by Rockies GM (Joey) on Mar 2, 2020 19:09:28 GMT -6
Looks like no one else is going to vote so I will write up the final version of the entire rule this week.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mariners GM (Kenny) on Mar 2, 2020 22:29:42 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by Rockies GM (Joey) on Mar 3, 2020 6:08:42 GMT -6
Thought I added yours when I did Indians guess not. |
|
