|
|
Post by Rockies GM (Joey) on Feb 16, 2020 8:19:18 GMT -6
Just to clear something up. Was it assumed that if you did not meet the mins (50 AB and/or 10 IP) that you would get automatic losses for those 2 categories plus the listed penalties?
Yes - Braves, Brewers, Angels, A's, Mets, Orioles (6)
No - Rays, Phillies, White Sox, Padres, Tigers, Reds, DBacks, Indians, Mariners (8)
Currently its not set-up that way but it's easy to do if assumed.
If it was not assumed, should it be that way
Yes - Braves, Brewers, Angels, A's, Mets, White Sox, Padres, Tigers, Indians, Mariners (10)
No - Rays, Phillies, Reds, DBacks (4)
13/28
|
|
|
|
Post by Braves GM (Isaiah) on Feb 16, 2020 10:25:55 GMT -6
For me, yes and yes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Phillies GM (Keith) on Feb 16, 2020 10:38:41 GMT -6
I don't really understand what we are voting on. Whether or not we assumed something earlier?
|
|
|
|
Post by Brew Crew GM - Tyler on Feb 16, 2020 19:58:33 GMT -6
Yes and Yes for me as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brew Crew GM - Tyler on Feb 16, 2020 20:00:19 GMT -6
I don't really understand what we are voting on. Whether or not we assumed something earlier? There are two simultaneous votes. #1 Did you assume not meeting the mins would be counted as losses. #2 if this was not an assumption that you made, would you like to see this as a rule. |
|
|
|
Post by rymiller (Angels GM) on Feb 16, 2020 22:42:26 GMT -6
Yes and yes
|
|
|
|
Post by morf1980 (Rays GM) on Feb 16, 2020 22:48:48 GMT -6
No
And no
So now we help the tankers by giving them free losses?
This rule is about preventing tanking. NOT about preventing winning with too few IP/AB
But either way, the rule could accomplish both.
I’m fine with both as long as the true reason of punishing those that don’t meet the mins with draft penalties applies. The whole discussion was around not rewarding someone for playing a dead lineup.
|
|
|
|
Post by OaklandGM on Feb 16, 2020 22:55:09 GMT -6
Yes and yes. Still punishing tankers through draft picks....also ensuring non-tankers don’t bench pitchers to win matchups (something almost all leagues already have in place that we are cleaning up here perhaps)
|
|
|
|
Post by NY Mets GM (Bob) on Feb 17, 2020 6:04:26 GMT -6
Yes and yes
So a 3rd infraction means a loss of 1st round pick
|
|
|
|
Post by Phillies GM (Keith) on Feb 17, 2020 6:39:33 GMT -6
No. And no.
|
|
|
|
Post by TJ (former White Sox) on Feb 17, 2020 8:44:35 GMT -6
No and yes
|
|
|
|
Post by PadresGM (BK) on Feb 17, 2020 11:09:44 GMT -6
No and Yes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Detroit GM (G-Funk) on Feb 17, 2020 15:36:06 GMT -6
No, yes
|
|
|
|
Post by rushmore (Reds GM) on Feb 18, 2020 6:07:37 GMT -6
no, no
|
|
|
|
Post by Rockies GM (Joey) on Feb 21, 2020 6:27:50 GMT -6
11 GMs out of 28 have voted so far.
|
|
